You are listening to the Daily Roundup here as part of the Reality C Podcast. I’m your host reality. Steve, thank you all for tuning in on this Friday as we head into the weekend. We’re gonna have a little bit look back at yesterday’s podcast briefly with Rachel Juarez. Also got some more survivor talk.
David does his post tribal council exit interview with Dalton Ross and he said something that came up on the traders this season, and I still have the same take as I did back then. Pilot, Pete is going to be on a new reality show that’s not Bachelor in Paradise and a little bit more on Jax because I got an email based on what I said about Jax yesterday and I wanna read it to you and respond to this person and we would get to all that momentarily.
So yesterday, podcast number four 40 with Rachel Juarez. I know a lot of you listened to it and a lot of you really liked it and. She really broke it down probably more. I mean, I guess that’s a matter of opinion, but I thought yesterday’s appearance by her was so good, and to answer the questions that she did in the way that she did, the ones that you guys sent in.
I thought was very, very informative. All of her stuff about Jerris in the first 30, 35 minutes of the podcast was excellent, and I really do think that. Look, I have not heard from Ingris outside of the day before he sent out those tweets to say he was filing for reconsideration because after his debate with Rachel, he thought she was completely nuts and this is the way he needed to go.
And then you heard what Rachel’s take is her theory is that he realized during that debate that he didn’t raise the most important thing that he needed to raise in his appeal, which was breaking down. The allocation of fees, and she feels that he used that debate, but because he could never, and this isn’t being hyperbole here, I don’t think this guy will ever give credit to a woman.
I don’t think he’ll ever listen to a woman who puts him in his place. I mean, you go back and watch that debate or listen to that debate. With her, it was kind of like. I kind of liken it to when I was on Nick’s podcast because in the moment when I was recording with Nick, it didn’t come across as as bad as it did once it aired.
Once I listened to it, like when I was done recording that, I was like, yeah, there were some things that I would’ve liked to have gotten out and I felt like Nick interrupted me a couple times, but. It wasn’t until I listened to it back and then when every single response to that was basically destroying Nick for how he conducted the interview.
And then I did find out some things after the interview that really set me off about him. But when I did, just taking the interview at face value and taking it. Just bare bones, just the interview itself. When I listened to it back, I was like, man, that was worse than I remember it. And that’s the same way I feel about the Rachel and Ingris debate.
Like I knew it was bad in the moment. Hell, I was texting people. There were a couple texts that I sent out during that. I don’t know if you see me on screen, you probably do, but I was just like, wow, this isn’t going how I thought it would. That was one of the texts I remember sending out. But it wasn’t until I watched it back that I realized, oh my gosh, he is being so dismissive of her so defensive.
She’s literally questioning him. Questioning him on certain things, and he’s beating around the bush, not answering it directly, and then getting flustered and blaming it on her and blaming it on. We need to move on. We need to get to another topic. It’s like we had two hours and 20 minutes. The reason we needed to move on.
It’s because you gave five and 10 minute answers, which again, I should have stepped in a little bit earlier because on a lot of those five or 10 minute answers, it didn’t need to be that long. He just went off on tangents and he would just bring up a new point and a new point, and a new point. And you heard me say to Rachel yesterday, and she’s just like, yeah, I, he’s exactly in that interview, the way he presents himself on his blog, on his tweets, and on his YouTube channel.
This is the way he is. And God forbid somebody tells him he’s wrong and says, I don’t agree with you. It’s like he didn’t agree with her. So in his mind she’s absolutely wrong. But if she didn’t disagree with him, if she didn’t, if she disagreed with him, she’s wrong still like nothing, she said. And I, and we went into that.
Both saying, look, you’re not gonna change his mind. He was never gonna change her mind and she was never gonna change his. But he didn’t present any arguments during that debate where she could be like, you know what, David? That’s a good point. I see what you’re saying there. Now she would’ve happily done that.
She told me she would’ve done that. She goes, he didn’t present anything. He’s not a good debater. What he’s good at is being a master debater. Sure to tip your waitress, but when she had great points, had stuff printed out, like I said in the podcast yesterday, I don’t think that David Ingris actually thought that Rachel read the case.
I think he thought that she was probably someone like Dave Neil, you know, not a lawyer, and just liked talking about the case. I don’t think he realized she went through every single case that he cited in his appeal, so she came prepared. You listen to that podcast, either yesterday’s or the debate podcast between them who sounded more prepared, not to mention him getting flustered, him making faces.
Who stayed calm and collected with their arguments and who did what he did, and fly off the handle and get defensive and say, you want a cookie, and say, can we move on? I guess we’ll just agree to disagree every time. He said, let’s agree to disagree on this. It was because she brought up a point that was better than his.
It’s a fascinating, fascinating thing. I can’t see us ever doing that again, just because he’s never going to listen. Yes, you could say let him show his ass again, but. I, I think two hours and 20 minutes of him is enough. I don’t think that he would listen to me if I said, David, if I bring you on again and we do this, you’re sticking to my parameters.
If I step in, it’s not because I just want to interrupt you. It’s because you’re giving these long ass answers that are going nowhere and you’re not answering the actual question. And again, the biggest point to with to, to David Ingris. Rachel said it yesterday, I’ve said it for months. If he’s not going to ever listen or have an open ear to the things that the JFC found and Dave Neil found pre David Ingris joining the case, we’re never getting anywhere with him.
He doesn’t wanna listen to it, but as Rachel said yesterday, that’s fine. If you wanna only talk about everything that. You know from when you took over, that’s fine, but then you can’t in the same breath, turn right around and call Mike Marni and Greg Gillespie. Bad guys and horrible humans. You don’t know anything that they’d done outside of what Laura told you.
You haven’t seen any of the evidence ’cause you haven’t read any of it. So you can’t have it both ways in that particular situation. But I hope you guys enjoyed that yesterday. I know I did real quickly on Survivor. I didn’t even bring this up last week, even though a lot of you brought it up to me because it was became an online thing.
When Eva got the advantage at the food challenge, at the reward challenge, we didn’t see, at least, I don’t remember seeing, you know, they put the scroll in her food, but. I missed it during the episode, or this certainly came out during a picture. After the episode, each person had a nameplate where they were supposed to sit.
So it’s like the show specifically planted it for Eva to find the advantage because if Eva had to sit in this particular spot because it said Eva on a plate, on a, on a placard, and then it had everyone else’s name where they were supposed to sit, and the food and the scroll was in her food. How would, that doesn’t seem fair, you know.
They ha have they addressed that publicly? Has Jeff mentioned it on his podcast? I don’t know. But yes, we know that they’ve hidden scrolls in food before, but it seemed like anyone can sit down and it just was a random luck if you happen to sit next to the food that had the scroll in it. This, they were told where to sit based on the name plates.
So, interested to see if that comes up later on, if it’s addressed post-season. Once the season is over and people start asking her questions or other people questions and they go on podcasts and stuff, because that’s, that seems to be an unfair advantage. David did his exit interview with Dalton Ross on ew.com last night, and as I mentioned in the open, he said something that happened on traders this summer and it happened again.
He claims that Joe swore on his kids that he would never write David’s name down. So some people say that, oh my gosh, that’s such a horrible thing to do. But just like when Danielle did it on traders, I’m like, can we stop in a game where you’re supposed to outwit, outplay, outlast, manipulate the games for a million dollars?
Well, we know Survivor is, we know traders is for like 13 cents, but in a game like Survivor, the game says Outwit, outplay, outlast. Can we stop making it such a big deal when people swear on their kids? Because nothing’s gonna happen to the kids. It, it, it’s, it’s just words. It doesn’t mean anything. I don’t lose any sort of respect for Joe because he said that he’s playing a game.
They’re all playing a game. You gotta do what you gotta do to win. Johnny Fairplay lied about his grandma being dead. Everybody back in the day thought that was the funniest thing ever. But yet if you say, oh, I swear on my kids, I won’t vote for you, man, you got my word in a game like this. No. In every in day to day activity, if you have someone at work that you want to tell a secret to or you have a story you want to tell, please don’t share that.
Oh no. I promise I won’t. I swear to my kids. I think that’s different. In a game where money’s on the line and you’re supposed to lie and outwit and outplay and outlast. I think words like that are hollow. I don’t think it matters, and I don’t, I don’t fault anyone for saying it, and if people are still gonna fall for it.
Now that we’ve seen on two shows that aired in the same nine month period, six month period, two shows where somebody swore on their kids and then went back on their word. I would think going forward, if you’re somebody that that happens to in a game like this, maybe you don’t believe them anymore.
That’s all I’m saying.
